
Looks like Sonja Norwood is getting the last laugh.
Kim Kardashian may have won the battle – but she will not win the war – if the tough-as-nails former music industry diva has anything to do with it.
Norwood, the "momager" of Brandy and Kardashian's ex-lover Ray-J, is suing her and her siblings for racking up over $120,000 in alleged illegal charges to her credit card.
According to The New York Post, court documents obtained claims that the alleged Hollywood socialite, who was Brandy's stylist in 2004, "was authorized to make one (and only one) purchase on behalf of [Sonja]," using her American Express card.
Norwood, a former finance industry exec, has gained a reputation as a shrewd business mind in Black Hollywood circles. (Her children have been working in the business since they were knee-high to a grasshopper.)
So ducats is something she does NOT play with.
The legal documents goes on to allege that the bootylicious sexpot shared Norwood's credit card number with siblings Khloe, Kourtney, and Robert Jr., leading to Kardashian shopping sprees at the Norwood's expense.Oh no ... White Collar Crime???
While the media may have not been kind to The Norwoods over the last few years, the law sure has.
Just as 2008 came into bloom, Brandy was "exonerated" from vehicular manslaughter charges and got off free and clear after a year of legal uncertainty.
Once considered the relatively unknown gal pal of Paris Hilton, Kardashian gained new-found fame with a starring role in a no-holds-barred sex video, starring and directed by Ray-J.
Since the release -- and the subsequent halting of retail sales – of the best-selling romp, the Armenian former divorcee has become mainstream tabloid fodder, the subject of a highly rated reality series, and a Playboy cover girl.
The daughter of late O.J. Simpson attorney Robert Kardashian, she was also reportedly rumored to be paid millions for the DVD, which was titled 'Kim Kardashian Superstar.'The allegedly unauthorized Norwood credit card charges included $62,793.83 in 2006, and $57,841.82 2007, for a total of $120,635.82 dollars. The suit claims that thousands were even spent at the Kardashian's own stores, Dash and Smooch.
A spokesperson for Kardashian, who is romantically linked to NFL star Reggie Bush, could not be reached at press time.
MORE TO IT:
Norwood released a statement to media outlets Feb. 5 explaining that her lawsuit against Kardashian was a last resort that was filed against the wishes of her two kids and after exhausting all other options.
"I did not want to commence litigation against the Kardashian family without conducting an exhaustive investigation into the charges and discussing all options, including criminal prosecution, with my family," the former H&R Block executive said.
"After Ray J and Brandy urged me not to file criminal charges because of their prior friendship, I decided to afford the Kardashians an opportunity to resolve this matter without a lawsuit," she explained. "When the fraudulent charges were brought to their attention, they apologized profusely, and advised us, through their attorneys, that they would pay the debt in full. However, they have since reneged on that promise."
Norwood, who once managed former music acts such as BeBe Winans, Silk,and 702, also said in her statement that her "investigation has revealed that the Kardashians used their two stores and other stores that I have never visited to take advantage of me. I very much look forward to having the Kardashians account for their misconduct in a court of law."
The lawsuit seeks repayment of the charges plus 10 percent interest.


Comments: (133)
Add a comment
By: LIA on 2/06/2008 12:13AM
You mean to tell me that someone spent THAT kind of money on another person's credit card in 2006 and she's JUST getting around to filing suit? Something sounds fishy to me.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Audra on 2/06/2008 12:22AM
so how come she filed suit and none of them have been arrested for credit card fraud? I tend to agree with LIA. This lawsuit sounds frivilous at best.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: brat2u on 2/08/2008 3:38PM
Civil cases take more then a year to come forth in most states with large populations. not to mention maybe Kim did not have the money then....but does now, to pay a judgement. it could be frivolous, but had she slept on her rights based on timelines to file, nothing will come of it. Not to mention, with brandy going through a criminal case, it was best not to file at that time, because most courts ask whether you have other pending litigations when you file and is public information. That might have tainted the jury, because in this country trial is now determined by TMZ, Nancy Grace etc., and Kardashian would have been portrayed thevictim.....true or not. It was a strategic move to pick your fights and adress them accordingly....if there is time left with filing constraints. These folks deal in millions of dollars, have accountants, and an investigation had to be done first, before accusations or slandering someone who is innocent....if Kim is innocent. I like all the parties involved, so I am just relating to how the system works, and why the wheels of justice is so slow. The average Civil lawsuit takes 2-7 years when it involves bigbucks....to come to trial.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: MS T on 2/06/2008 5:29PM
i am sick of these rich people who is with me!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Ken on 2/06/2008 12:01PM
Civil cases may take long, but why not press criminal charges? If someone stole money from me, especially a huge amount like that, the first thing I would have done is file a crminal complaint, and I certainly wouldn't wait a year or even a few months to do it.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Donna Moran on 2/06/2008 12:56PM
Kim's punshiment show be doing that stupid show without any makeup. Yikes! That would be pretty scary.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: DarkNLuvly on 2/06/2008 12:58PM
How is it that someone would take such liberties to such a ridiculous degree without permission to do so? This is just one more example that
one does not have to exemplify the stereotypical background of someone whose roots lies within a trailer park community to be what
one might refer to as a "red neck".
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Loretha on 2/07/2008 7:01AM
Im believe Ms.Norwood was prioritizing what she felt was more important at the time.Here her daughter may have been sent to jail for an ACCIDENT that killed a woman who was high on drugs found in the toxicology reports.That was her #1 priority.With all the money that family has those few hundred thousand may be a lot to the average person but thats a drop in the bucket in comparison to what they have.It's the principle in the matter.The time has come for her to face the piper.She stole from this woman now her day in court is coming.She is NOT the victim here.If the accusations are true she needs to go to jail,ooooppps my bad, maybe she thinks she's too cute to go to jail.Seems to be becoming an AMERICAN trend.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Truth B Told (Click here to start building your financial freedom)! on 2/07/2008 8:07AM
How the law works!
When your rich, you don't automatically notice missing money because 1st of all , your always busy working.
Secondly, us poor people who have very little (watch our pennies and dollars), while rich people normally just eat - sleep - shyt - and find ways to make more money.
When you notice missing finances, the 1st thing you do is take assessment (try to back-track your own steps to make sure your didnt spend the money yourself).
Now after you determine that these missing finances, have been illegally removed from your possession or accounts/credit cards, you then contact the authorities.
They begin to build a solid case by investigating the charges on the credit card that you claim are fraudulent.
Then they trace the credit cards back to the location the credit cards are used at, be it a merchant store/online(ip address), or by phone.
Now once they know where the credits were used at, and get intouch with the establishment to determine who made these charges and when.
They do a lot of paperwork.
Once they have compiled enough evidence to be able to charge you, that's when the information that may have taken months and in some case 1-2 years to compile are made public (usually by your arrest).
Now with all that being said, keep in mind that the Norwood family has been going through the agony of Brandy's accident turned fatality of another person, and the possibility of Brandy facing serious jail time.
I believe these things as they occured and the timeline for the events it takes to bring the charges and evidence to the forefront are consistant with how the law actually works.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: rhonda shaw on 2/07/2008 9:49AM
I didn't know that the charges were dropped for Brandy.
The media didn't shout that loud and clear. However we knew when she was charged. Hopefully Brandy can get her life back in order. She has just as much talent as anybody else I see on television or making music.
What's at stake now? Getting Obama elected. We can do this. He is so close. People don't know how close he is because the "news" is making it seem like Hillary is winning. If we continue to support him by voting in those States where elections are coming up, he can take this election. Call people your family and friends in States with upcoming elections, and encourage them to vote for Obama.
Reply to this Comment | Report This