The Internet and a few black film industry experts are in an uproar over Vanity Fair's "New Hollywood" cover, which doesn't feature a single woman of color.
Black Voices previously reported that famed photographer Annie Leibovitz shot the nine young women, which include Abbie Cornish, Kristen Stewart, Carey Mulligan, Amanda Seyfried, Rebecca Hall, Mia Wasikowska, Anna Kendrick, Emma Stone, and Evan Rachel Wood. Only Kendrick and Mulligan garnered 2010 Oscar nominees out of the bunch.
So who was missing?
'Avatar' star Zoe Saldana, who made the cut in 2008, was perhaps the greatest breakout star of the year -- starring in two of the biggest blockbusters ("Star Trek' and 'Avatar').
Best actress Oscar nominee Gabourey Sidibe of 'Precious: Based on the Novel 'Push' by Sapphire' delivered one of the most critically acclaimed performances of the year. And her co-star Paula Patton was no slouch either.
Forgotten 'American Violet' actress Nicole Beharie is worthy of note, and so is last year's beautiful newcomer Freida Pinto (of 'Slumdog Millionire' ).
But they were obviously persona non grata when it came to Leibovitz's camera lens.
In response to the widespread criticism, Vanity Fair issued a statement. Vanity Fair's Hollywood cover has always been a reflection of Hollywood and the industry. Generally, as is the case this year, it¹s made up of young actresses who already have a few films to their credit and will be appearing in more movies in the coming months."

Still, some are unconvinced that there's not some wide-spread discrimination at play.
Former 'Extra' host Tanika Ray, who is gearing up to host the hour-long TV Guide Network special ''Precious: The Story Behind the Movie,' is one of those people.
She told BV Buzz, "There is a lack of diversity in Hollywood. Just look at the cover of Vanity Fair this month celebrating the fresh hot new talent of Hollywood. There isn't a trace of melanin on the entire three-page fold-out cover. It's insulting in 2010, which makes shows like the TV Guide Network special even more important to help break down that wall of exclusion and film segregation."
Now, Sidibe is commenting on not making the cover.
The 26-year-old told Shaun Robinson of 'Access Hollywood' at Monday's Oscar nominee luncheon that she initially was taken aback by not getting a call to participate in the now-controversial photo shoot.
"At first I thought, 'hmm, should I be there?'" she said. "Then, I very quickly got over it. I think if I were a part of that shoot I would have felt a little left out anyway," perhaps hinting at the lack of color and diversity in body size of the women who did make the cover.
Sidibe was, however, featured inside the magazine. And she's just as grateful for the recognition.
"I mean, I come from a world where I'm not on covers and I'm not in magazines at all and so I was happy to be in the magazine."
She is taking it all in stride, and added, "I wasn't on it, and I'm excited to be mentioned anywhere, and it doesn't matter to me where I'm not mentioned."
Sidibe is gracing the cover of the March edition of the black-owned Ebony magazine.


Comments: (11)
Add a comment
By: Brown Sugah Baby on 2/18/2010 12:31PM
I don't know and honestly, don't care what their reasons were for not including the women of color who should have made the cut.
I do know, however, how to respond to such blatant and obvious discrimination - don't support the publication or anything associated with it. Easy. Its always the best way to combat subtle racial inequality when dealing with business and money.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Mimi on 2/23/2010 12:28AM
I DON'T KNOW ANY OF THOSE WOMEN ON THAT MAGAZINE. WHAT I DO KNOW IS, WHITE ACTRESSES COME A DIME A DOZEN. ALL OF THOSE WHITE ACTRESSES ON THE COVER TODAY WILL BE LONG FORGOTTEN NEXT YEAR THIS TIME WHEN A NEW GROUP OF WHITE ACTRESSES ARE RECRUITED.
WHAT THEY SHOULD DO IS GATHER ALL OF THE COVERS OF THE PAST ISSUES OF "NEW HOLLYWOOD" AND DO AN ISSUE ON "WHERE ARE THEY NOW?"
Report This
By: Liberty on 2/18/2010 7:03PM
Vanity Fair's response for the omission of blacks is typical. All blacks who subscribe their magazines should cancel! Why should someone disrespect you and still make money off you?
Liberty
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: chzz on 2/18/2010 10:25PM
Right.You expected "new Hollywood"to be different from "old Hollywood"?
And Vanity Fair?I don't care who is on or in their magazine because I do not buy it.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: barbarascy385 on 2/19/2010 11:14AM
This is typical behavior from Hollywood. Nothing new about it at all. What they don't seem to realize is if African Americans were to stop buying Vanity Fare, or worse, stop attending Hollywood films the results would be catastrophic. We do have economic power and they are very lucky that we have never truly used it against them. But that may change one day. I would suggest an opening of the minds and a more inclusive attitude. Nobody wants it to come to boycotts as it will have dire consequences for the industry and the jobs it provides. But, you can't keep slighting and insulting a group of people that have contributed so much financially to your industry.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: sharkchops on 2/20/2010 1:32AM
Who cares? It's their magazine. Let them put who they want on it. Blacks don't have to read it. Essence isn't putting or Kirsten Dunst or Jessica Biel on their covers are they. In fact, for a minority publication, they're not putting Jessica Alba or Sandra Oh on there either so why think Vanity Fair owes anything to minorities? It's not like whites ran out in droves to go see "Precious".
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: David on 2/20/2010 10:06AM
Let's get real, this is about selling magazines. Who the fuk wants to see this morbidly obese unattractive women on the cover of a magazine? Black people should have been more critical of the stereotypical trash movie she was in Precious rather than getting upset over this non story. Now Avatar and Star Trek star Zoe Saldana is attractive and does have crossover appeal to whites. She would have fit on the cover IMO. But I think she's a little older than most of the young white girls on the cover. But the bottom line is white mags like Vanity Fair sell to whites. The reality is that fat dark skinned black women are not going to sell well with there white readers unless they are selling a stereotypical mammy image like Oprah. They were selling beauty not pancakes. Yes if they tried hard enough they probably could have found someone black but who cares. Like someone has already pointed out we have rags like Essence to put black women on their cover. Usually in these type of situations white magazines find a light skinned damn near white mulatto to pass off as black.
These type of magazines are about perpetuating the image of beauty and whether you like to hear or not Gabourey Sidibe is not attractive by most peoples standards including black people! I don't even like looking at the pic of her here on Blackvoices! lol I sure as hell wouldn't pay to see her on a magazine cover and I'm black. It's as simple as that.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Sir on 2/21/2010 5:47AM
David,David,David!!! First, you're a liar. There is about as much a possibility as your being Black (Besides in your heart)as there is my being your biological father.Concerning Ms. Gabourey Sidibe, it's obvious to everyone that YOUR definition of a beautiful Black woman is as mature and realistic as any episode of The Simpsons or Family Guy. Two shows that I'd bet you most relate to.I believe, that you're a chicken-hearted person who has not drop of understanding concerning Black beauty, nor any other.And who are YOU to decide for the rest of us? If you really had understood YOUR OWN WORDS, you'd never have spoken them.We each have our own perceptions and definitions of beauty, regardless of color,size, etc...,and that's just the way it T-I-Z.Beauty IS in the eye of the beholder.But,one SHOULD mature so that he or she may come to know that beauty is deeper than one's skin.Just as all ugliness is.You have obviously never witnessed her intellect or seen her acting, let alone both. I can tell you this: She's far more articulate than you are, more beautiful than your black heart and spirit could even begin to understand, and, unlike you (I suppose)in possession of an IQ that cannot be numbered on one hand. I pity you, and all generic men like you, regardless of SKIN color.One more thing: REAL MEN donb't allow themselves to discuss who's sexing whom. Because we don't really care, and it benefits NOONE. Why do YOU care? I've already addressed that. They call me, Sir.
Report This
By: Elle on 2/22/2010 12:16AM
Unfortunately, I agree with some of what Sharkchop is saying. It is "their" magazine and they cater to the lilly, skinny, white girls as pictured on their cover. In this case they should have stated somewhere "young, white & skinny Hollywood" if they plan on not including young women of color or people of differnet body types.
Even being year 2010, white people still own most of the media companies and outlets (Hollywood is one and is by far the worst)and they will make the rules and it will favor them.
This is the very reason why "we" have our own magazines, BET and other black-owned media outlets(even though BET is white owned now). Everyone knows people of color have always been discriminated against and segregated from the whites. This was their idea, not ours. Our accomplishments would not ever be recognized as much as they should if we did not recognize ourselves first. This Vanity Fair cover is a reality check to remind us that media (in general)does not feel they need to acknowledge our achievements even though they are equal to or better than our white counterparts.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: AM Hood on 2/25/2010 3:24PM
I do not cater to /but white mags I only look for what looks like me and pertains to me. So it does not matter to me. After all the mag is called V. Fair, I do not expect anything from them.
When we learn that we can not depend on these poeple to be there for us the better off we will be and move on to start the process of helping our on. After all that is what they do.
Reply to this Comment | Report This